OutSmart is gebruiksvriendelijk, compleet en gewoon makkelijk in gebruik. Voor ons dé tool die ik elke organisatie zou aanraden.
Kimberley, Oostendorp Nederland
Benchmark 2026 · 2,210 customer environments · 16.7 million work orders
How many work orders does a technician handle per month? How quickly does the invoice follow a completed job? And how long does a work order actually sit in the back office? These are not estimates from a survey — they are aggregated usage figures from 2,210 OutSmart customer environments.
All values are medians: half of the companies sit above them, half below. Reference date: 4 June 2026.
What is the Field Service Benchmark 2026? The Field Service Benchmark 2026 is an overview of aggregated usage figures from 2,210 OutSmart customer environments, with a reference date of 4 June 2026. It shows how many work orders field service companies process, how quickly work moves from planning to invoice, and how those figures differ by company size and by country. All numbers are medians across companies rather than averages, so a single very large company cannot pull the result upwards.
The point of this page is to put your own numbers next to those of comparable companies. If five technicians produce 20 work orders a month while the median sits at 52, that tells you how much work still runs outside the system. If it takes three weeks to invoice a completed job while the median is four days, you know where your working capital is going.
Across all customer environments, 16.7 million work orders have been processed. In 2025 that was 2.97 million, up from 2.77 million in 2024 — 7% growth in total volume. Of the companies active in both years, 55% saw their work order count increase.
| What | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Work orders | 16,671,290 | total processed; 2.97M in 2025 |
| Completed forms | 5,134,638 | checklists, inspections, handover reports |
| Automations executed | 6,429,790 | by 752 companies (34%) |
| Quotes | 531,259 | of which 180,670 approved |
| Maintenance contracts | 148,677 | of which 113,301 active |
| Assets recorded | 1,335,320 | installations, machines and locations |
| Customer records | 5,168,980 | with 13.3M line items |
Source: aggregated usage data from 2,210 OutSmart customer environments, reference date 4 June 2026.
The most interesting part of this data is not the execution — it is the administration afterwards. A work order is executed within a median of 2.9 days and administratively processed within 4.6 days. After that it still takes a median of 39 days before it is finally settled and archived, and a quarter of companies take more than 218 days.
| Step in the process | Median | Companies |
|---|---|---|
| Quote created → approved | 8.0 days | 733 |
| Approval → work order created | 2.6 days | 520 |
| Work order scheduled → completed | 2.9 days | 2,044 |
| Completed → administratively processed | 4.6 days | 1,850 |
| Completed → invoiced | 4.1 days | 877 |
| Processed → archived | 39 days | 1,576 |
| Quote → invoice (no work order) | 28 days | 406 |
| Contract → first automatic work order | 4.2 days | 461 |
| Trial started → live in use | 30 days | 2,159 |
Medians across companies. The number of companies differs per step because not every company uses every module: quotes are used by 53% of companies, maintenance contracts by 26%.
Company size is the strongest predictor in the entire dataset. The typical company has five licensed technicians; a quarter has nine or more. An active technician handles a median of 24 work orders per month, rising to 84 among the ten percent most productive companies.
| Technicians | Companies | Work orders per month | Hours per work order | Uses automation | Uses contracts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (sole trader) | 246 | 7 | 2.15 | 7% | 3% |
| 2–4 | 625 | 18 | 1.99 | 14% | 10% |
| 5–9 | 848 | 52 | 2.09 | 43% | 37% |
| 10–24 | 401 | 134 | 2.84 | 55% | 40% |
| 25 or more | 86 | 280 | 3.12 | 74% | 35% |
Between companies with two to four technicians and companies with five to nine, use of automation triples (from 14% to 43%) and working with maintenance contracts goes from 10% to 37%. Below five people, software is mainly used to record work orders; above it, it becomes the system the work itself originates from.
Medians per size class; percentages show the share of companies within that class that actually used the feature.
Werkbonnen per jaar
Klanten vertrouwen op OutSmart
Jaren ervaring
OutSmart is gebruiksvriendelijk, compleet en gewoon makkelijk in gebruik. Voor ons dé tool die ik elke organisatie zou aanraden.
Kimberley, Oostendorp Nederland
OutSmart is zeer professioneel en onmisbaar in ons bedrijfsproces. Alle processen draaien nu veel efficiënter.
Twan van Horssen, Mobility Installations
Dutch companies are the largest group with 1,355 customer environments and invoice the fastest: a median of 0.75 days after completing the work order, against 2.06 days in Belgium. Portuguese companies are the heaviest users of digital forms: 87% of them complete forms alongside work orders, against 68% in the Netherlands.
| Country | Companies | Work orders per month | Uses forms | Uses automation | Records assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1,355 | 51 | 68% | 35% | 41% |
| Belgium | 240 | 40 | 48% | 20% | 39% |
| Portugal | 102 | 51 | 87% | 37% | 50% |
| German-speaking | 30 | 40 | 63% | 30% | 50% |
| Spain | 18 | 45 | 72% | 28% | 44% |
Compare your own numbers to the row that matches your company size, not to the overall average. If you sit well below the median work orders per month, work is probably still running outside the system — by phone, WhatsApp or on paper. If you sit well above the median time to invoice, that translates directly into working capital: at 52 work orders a month, every week of invoicing delay costs roughly a week of revenue in liquidity.
Country names have been normalised; 455 customer environments have no country recorded and fall outside this table. The German-speaking region and Spain, with 30 and 18 companies, are too small for firm conclusions and are included for completeness only.
Questions about the methodology, or interested in a breakdown for your own industry? Get in touch — we are happy to help.